Posts 
Comments
Email 
Liberal activists and Democratic politicians have attempted to demonize the Chick-fil-A restaurant franchise because 
of its owner’s religious views supporting a traditional biblical marriage. They’ve urged a boycott of the restauarant chain, their plans completely backfired and the opposite happened.
Chicago Mayor Rahm Emanuel and a Chicago Alderman thinking they are dictators have even gone so far as declaring that no permits will be issued to the restaurant chain to establish new restaurants in “their” cities.
That prompted the Chicago GOP to file a complaint against Emanuel and Alderman Joe Moreno with the Illinois Attorney General’s Office for breaking the state’s civil rights laws by discriminating against the right to practice a religion and serious trouble for their abuse of power. Serious troubles may soon be out their doorsteps for their clear volition and infringement on the companies right to open a business, as well as it employees rights to practice religion.
Yesterday, conservative activists urged supporters of the restaurant to patronize the restaurant in a show of support dubbed Chick-fil-A Appreciation Day. By all accounts, supporters packed into the chain’s restaurants across the nation, including liberal controlled cities such as Indianapolis. The turnout so astounding the restaurant chain had hours waits and lines outside the door and beyond. The boycott completely backfired on the leftist, There are rumors that Chick-fil-A may set a new world record for sales in a single day, though the company has yet to release any sales numbers it may be added to the Guinness Book of World Records.
The leftist mainstream completely blacked out this Chick-fil-A Story mostly. You wouldn’t know anything about the national phenomenon and long lines and Chick-fil-A by reading the front pages of most of the country’s leading newspapers.
There’s no mention of Chick-fil-A and its lines wrapping around blocks on the front pages of the New York Times, the Wall Street Journal, the Washington Post, the Chicago Tribune, the Los Angeles Times, the South Florida Sun-Sentinel, and the Boston Globe. The front pages of USA Today, the Dallas Morning News, and the Houston Chronicle have small headlines about the restaurant, while Chick-fil-A’s hometown paper, the Atlanta Journal-Constitution, fits in a story below the fold under the heading, “Chick-fil-A Controversy.” And the front pages of major news websites are quiet in their coverage as well.
Little do they expect their boycott to fail so miserably, besides long lines out the door, they just gave Chick-fil-A multitudes of millions of dollars in free exposure, completely at not cost to the company. Many other conservative businesses should speak out in support of traditional marriage?
Thank you Chic-Fill-A! Marriage is between one man and one woman. The gay community has the right to protest. Our constitution guarentees it. They also have the right to be wrong. I stand on the word of God, the B.I.B.L.E. It hasnt let me down yet. We all need to pray for the LGBT community, after all we are to hate the sin not the sinner. We are to show Gods love and compassion to others. Without love we Christians are nothing. God bless you and much continued sucess.
The subject of Same Sex Marriage, becoming the “new” platform of the Democratic Party, has once again, regardless of our opposition to it based on religious belief, caused my wife and I to explore the issue in-depth, examining it from both sides of the argument as can only be fair. We have always asserted that one must be prepared to debate an issue pro or con based on a coin toss in our home. In fact, many conversations have been ended due to lack of one or the other having full understanding of the issue.
As a result I have concluded the following:
1. Prior to the inception of the State Marriage License, marriages, births, and deaths in the United States of America were recorded in the family Bible and Church Records.
2. The States, by requiring a State issued Marriage License, usurped church authority and violated the separation of Church and State. The State now decides who is eligible to enter into the most intimate of human relationships.
3. The State uses the Marriage License to generate revenue. It traditionally uses financial rewards in the form of tax breaks to encourage participation. It has in the past used civil/criminal penalties (i.e., cohabitation laws, polygamy laws – actually polygyny – and statutory rape laws) to entice and coerce compliance.
4. Most persons who are opposed to same sex marriage do so based on religious beliefs.
5. Most people in favor of same sex marriage do not have a religious faith.
6. Heterosexuals and Homosexuals (that includes the female version) are members of society and entitled to the full privileges and protection of the State as to civil rights regardless of any opinion to the contrary.
7. Many homosexuals have entered into lifelong same sex relationships of cohabitation throughout history.
8. Many heterosexuals have entered into lifelong opposite sex relationships of cohabitation throughout history.
9. Many homosexuals cannot maintain a lifelong relationship.
10. Many heterosexuals cannot maintain a lifelong relationship.
11. A State issued Marriage License cannot guarantee a successful marriage any more that a State issued Fishing License can guarantee that one will catch a fish.
12. Radical feminist “anti-male” indoctrination, poverty, divorce, single female households, and homosexuality, tend to rise and fall together.
13. Intolerance is prevalent with both extremes of the issue. However, vituperous mob bullying tactics, oppression of alternative opionon, and “pseudo-victims” engaged in public outcry seem to be the prevalent tactics among pro same sex marriage supporters.
14. Religious belief with the assertion that marriage is a religious institution coupled with the right of free speech and religious freedom are most prevalent in those who oppose same sex marriage. These often end with frustrated outbursts of vulgarity delivered as verbal assaults and demeaning tirades directed toward homosexuals and their supporters
If we accept the above assertions:
1. A reasonable man would have to conclude that the State erred in awarding financial gain to submit to relationship control by the government since it has failed to establish contractual language around the marriage license, which includes specified rights when dissolved or broken.
2. That by using Christian based terminology; the State has excluded those of other faiths, sexual orientations, or philosophical views from access to marriage.
3. By failure of the State to enforce the contract inferred by said marriage license; they have committed fraud; caused much social dsyfunction; emotional suffering; childhood poverty; gender oppression; and violence against the people it exists to protect.
All of you who are against gay Marriage are absolutely out of your mind. Why do people get married now a days? Because they’re in love with each other right? I don’t see why you have to marry one of the opposite sex. It’s crazy and ridiculous. We all have the right to love. We all have the right to marry who we chose. But I don’t see why you have to look at it as a sin. Just because it’s based out of a book? I believe there is a God. But much different than from what you see him as. My God is all love. Nothing he does is a mistake. If it were a sin to be gay, than why would he make you in the first place? My God excepts all religions. My God wants me to do what I feel is best for my life. My god wants me to make the right decisions. My God will help me get to where I need to be in my life. My God will not judge me for who I am attracted to. My God loves me for me. And when I am finished serving my purpose in life, I will be with my God.