American Diplomats In Libya Made Repeated Requests For Security; Denied by Obama Admin

U.S. Consulate in Benghazi after the building was raided by gunmen who set it on fire.

American diplomats serving in Benghazi made repeated requests for security this past year over numerous threats but were denied. Stevens himself was threatened and had to cancel his morning runs to to security concerns.

This information is coming from individuals with direct knowledge of events in Libya and House Oversight Committee leaders included this information in their report today. The House Oversight Committee letter lists 13 attacks Libyan and incidents in the six months prior to the assassination of Ambassador Stevens.

The House Oversight Committee released photos of the badly damaged vehicle from the June attempt to assassinate the British Ambassador.

The AP reported:

American diplomats in Libya made repeated requests for increased security for the consulate in Benghazi and were turned down by the Obama Administration, leaders of a House committee said Tuesday.

In a letter to Secretary of State Hillary Rodham Clinton, Chairman Darrell Issa and Rep. Jason Chaffetz said their information came from “individuals with direct knowledge of events in Libya.”

Issa, R-Calif. and Chaffetz, R-Utah said the Sept. 11 attack in Benghazi that killed Ambassador Chris Stevens and three other Americans was the latest in a long line of attacks on Western diplomats and officials in Libya in the months before Sept. 11.

The lawmakers said they plan a hearing on Oct. 10. They asked Clinton whether the State Department was aware of the previous incidents, and whether the level of security that was provided to the U.S. mission met the security threat, and how the department responded to requests for more security.

In Case You Missed It:  News Flash: DOJ Targeted Other Conservatives

Referring to the Sept. 11 attacks, the letter said, “It was clearly never, as Obama administration officials once insisted, the result of a popular protest.”

The Obama Administration has refused to answer questions about whether extra security was sought by officials in Benghazi ahead of the Sept. 11 attack. Clinton did, however, discuss security on Sept. 18, when asked whether measures were appropriate.

“Let me assure you that our security in Benghazi included a unit of host government security forces, as well as a local guard force of the kind that we rely on in many places around the world,” she said. Perhaps she is suggesting the same security in revolution filled Libya as in Switzerland?

“In addition to the security outside the compound, we relied on a wall and a robust security presence inside the compound. And with all of our missions overseas, in advance of September 11th, as is done every year, we did an evaluation on threat streams. And the Office of the Director of National Intelligence has said we had no actionable intelligence that an attack on our post in Benghazi was planned or imminent.”

Clinton claimed that diplomats “engage in dangerous work, and it’s the nature of diplomacy in fragile societies and conflict zones to be aware of the necessity for security but to also continue the important diplomatic work that has to go on.

White House spokesman Jay Carney refused to comment on House Republicans’ assertions that Libyan mission requested security before 9-11.

Posted in Terrorism, Tyranny and tagged , , , , , , , .

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Optionally add an image (JPEG only)

 

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.