The Khafir is Always to Blame

By Paul Austin MurphyMuslims arrested in Germany

The leader of the Muslim Public Affairs (MPACUK), Asghar Bukhari, when interviewed by the BBC, placed the entire blame for the murder in Woolwich on the West. He didn’t have a single word to say about totalitarian Islamism and certainly not about jihad in Islam itself or in the Koran. No. The khafir, as always, is entirely to blame. And Muslims, as always, are only passive victims. But there’s nothing new here.

What is the government likely to do apart from condemn the violence and deny the link between our own foreign policy and domestic acts of violence by some of Britain’s Muslims? Nothing whatsoever. Despite the Muslim Public Affairs Committee’s efforts, the depressingly predictable and familiar cycle of violence is likely to continue until the government accepts the real link between the two. Only then will any solution be within reach. — MPACUK, 23.5.2013

Even when Muhammad, and later Muslim leaders, invaded all the surrounding empires and countries, they said it was all a matter of defense. The Muslim imperialist empires conquered a third of the world defensively. After all, as the saying goes, “The best form of defense is attack.”

So Muslims rationalise their endless acts of aggression and war in terms of defense and their being attacked by infidels. That’s also the language of the Koran. The gimmick of defense was also used by Adolf Hitler when he first invaded the Sudetenland, then the rest of Czechoslovakia, then Poland. All these countries were said to be either a threat to Germany or had supposedly already attacked it.

Asghar Bukhari specifically singles out Afghanistan and Iraq. Nonetheless, Western troops no longer ‘occupy’ Iraq. This country now has a Shia Muslim government. That’s unless MPACUK is condoning retrospective retribution or revenge for what Western troops did in Iraq.

As for Afghanistan, there are 66,000 U.S. troops in that country. Despite that, there are vast swathes of the country in which there are no Western soldiers at all. Of course 66,000 soldiers can still do much damage; but it still can’t be called an ‘occupation’ (a buzzword from both the Left and from Muslims).

MPACUK has also conveniently forgotten why we went into Afghanistan in the first place — because of 9/11 and the numerous terrorist bases that litter that country and the Pakistani borders with Afghanistan. If we hadn’t gone in, the Taliban would probably rule the entire country today. May be this is what’s truly behind the Islamists of MPACUK — they didn’t mind the prospect of complete Taliban rule in Afghanistan (just as the Islamist leaders of Pakistan wanted, and still want, the Taliban to rule there).

Let’s stop the BS. It’s not ‘all about Afghanistan and Iraq.’

Ramin HaghighiTake Osama bin Laden. He was mainly motivated by the presence of U.S. personnel in Saudi Arabia (certainly not ‘occupiers’); not by Afghanistan, Iraq or even Palestine. Take another example. Three pre-Afghanistan and pre-Iraq bombings were carried out by Muslim group in 1977 in Washington. These bombings were a response to the showing of a ‘blasphemous’ film about the prophet Mohammed.

And what about all the Islamic acts of violence and terrorism that aren’t anything to do with Iraq, Afghanistan, or any ‘occupations’? What about the bombing of Charlie Hebdo‘s offices in Paris? The fatwa on Salman Rushdie? The riots and deaths because of the Muhammad cartoons and the film ‘Innocence of Muslims’? The killing of Pim Fortuyn and Theo van Gogh? The Egyptian Muslim Brotherhood started its own bombing, assassination, and killing campaign in the 1920s. Islamic terrorism continued up to the 1960s and beyond. The list is endless.

MPACUK’s focus on Afghanistan is disingenuous in the extreme.

Islamists will always rationalize jihad in terms of defence. This has happened throughout those 1,350 years of jihad. Islamist bombings will still occur even if we pulled out of Afghanistan. And what about MPACUK’s other rationalisation of jihad and its real monomania — Israel?

It doesn’t matter about ‘foreign interventions’: many Muslims kill people simply because they are ‘unbelievers’. The deaths and persecutions in the Muslim world are largely carried out by minds oblivious to any Western interventions; they are about jihad and sharia law — about Islam. The Islamic jihad reached its peak when the Islamic world was the great power; not when it was ‘oppressed’ by the West.

MPACUK calls on Muslims to get a little extreme; no we call on Muslims to get very extreme. The time for moderation is over, the time for passive acceptance is gone, no longer are we held back by empty platitudes of ‘serving the community’. Muslims need to get active and get vocal now…. – MPACUK, 2010

MAPCUK also calls for more ‘democratic activity’ from Muslims. However, democratic activity only when it comes to Islamic issues and the situation of Muslims in the world. MPACUK is utterly communalist/sectarian in nature — as its name suggests. Everything it says is said through either the prism of Islam or the situation of Muslims either in the UK or abroad. In fact it’s hardly worth stressing ‘democratic involvement’ at all if that involvement is completely determined by Islam and the affairs of Muslims as Muslims. MPACUK may as well agitate for full sharia law — it would have the same results.

Despite all that, MPACUK has also spoken out against democratic activity; though it hasn’t spoken out against political activity. It has called for Muslims ‘to get more extreme’ and much else. It is taking, in fact, the Muslim Brotherhood approach of using democracy and democratic means to further the cause of Islam and Muslims — ultimately, to bring about sharia law and Muslim self-rule. All this, again, partly through the means of British democratic processes.

MPACUK is not against Islamic terrorism. It rationalises, justifies, and explains it. Nonetheless, like the Egyptian Muslim Brotherhood, it also believes that by using Western (non-Islamic) democratic processes, it can further both Islam and the cause of Muslims. That is, MPACUK essentially uses democracy in order to destroy democracy. That’s why it prefers ‘democratic involvement’ to what it sees as often counterproductive examples of Islamic terrorism.

VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
Rating: 10.0/10 (4 votes cast)
The Khafir is Always to Blame, 10.0 out of 10 based on 4 ratings
Posted in Terrorism and tagged , , , , .


  1. Unless reformed, current practice of Islam can never come to terms with Peace.

    VA:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: +1 (from 1 vote)
    • Probably reform is not proper word. Keeping in view the need of time, through “Ijtehad” the correct interpretation of Islamic real teachings is the answer. Mojadid is the normal terminology in Muslim world who interprets Quranic terminologies. However Khalifa of time is considered superior to Mojadid. Currently only Ahmadiyya Muslim Community has system of Khilafat. No other Muslim group claims either to have Khalifa or Mojadid. So observe deeply the Quranic interpretation followed by Ahmadiyya Muslim Community. Answers to many questions will become available.

      VA:F [1.9.22_1171]
      Rating: 0 (from 4 votes)
      • Dear Zubair Mian, being sensitive and trying to attempt indefensible is not going to convince. It seems that you belong to the ostracised Ahmadiya Muslim community who hated and debarred in Pakistan and elsewhere also by the brutal Sunni Muslim jihadi organisations. If you don’t try to understand the English, Sanskrit and Hebrew words, why should others be bothered by this fake jihadi cult. Go back to other researches where it is being discussed that which Quran and which Prophet, are we talking about i.e. Fatima’s or Uthman’s Prophet and Qurans. Why did Uthman incinerate all those available manuscripts of Quran in his life after differences with Fatima? First clean your own house before trying to suggest others the right words. World is not fool. Why don’t you fight these Sunni brutes (read Zia-ul Haq) who legally debarred the Ahmadiyas everywhere. Shame on this taqiya ideology which has engendered the entire world peace which is needing to spend trillians of currencies to safeguard against these Muslim extremists all over.

        VA:F [1.9.22_1171]
        Rating: +2 (from 2 votes)
        • What Taqiya?
          [Qur’an 33:71] “O ye who believe! fear Allah, and say the right word.”
          [Qur’an 2:43] “And confound not truth with falsehood nor hide the truth, knowingly.”

          Hazrat Uthman incinerated manuscripts to ensure consistency in accents … surely you don’t think different accents are different versions?

          We don’t fight by taking law into our own hands but we do try to preach the true message of peace of Islam:

          Muslimsforlife(dot)org – successfully collected 10,000 pints of blood to honor 3,000 dead of 9/11 (by saving 30,000 lives.
          Muslimsforpeace(dot)org – condemning terrorism, promoting Islamic value of loyalty to ones nation, peace, bus-ads and flyers and leaflets to promote the same.
          love4all(dot)org(dot)uk – We serve humanity in many ways including a wide range of activities that provide disaster relief, medical facilities, energy, education and self-help programmes across the world.

          Islam is a religion of peace. And the sadest things is that terrorists are using the name of Islam while conducting their heinous actions.

          VA:F [1.9.22_1171]
          Rating: -3 (from 3 votes)
  2. “What Taqiya?” My dear (gentle)man, This is not a decent way to start a discussion, then producing a long list of fake charity, behind which your false (taqiya and Kitman) strategems are enacted. In fact your hyper escitment in defence is unnecessary. Instead of words, convince the world with your deeds. Forget about what the Islam calls Kafirs, non-believers (worthy of death, zizya or conversion to Islam). History is full of Islamic records of brutalities and tortures. Stop befooling yourself. Come to senses gentleman and stop being indecent to others whom you don’t agree with. Why should you be fighting in Iraq, Syria, Bahrain? Are those also Kafirs?

    In fact your entire rant itself is a taqiya and kitman stratagem. Go and cool down instead of using fatwa, jihad, taqiya, kitman, etc etc. Aggression must be either self restrained or it will attract counter strategy by your victims. Why can’t they engage in some constructive work in place of constant destruction in the name of an untenable ideology. World must be convinced who are not only suspicious but genuinely agrieved with your show of blood letting. Go and have a sleep to refreshen yourself. One more thing, Why Ahmadias are non-muslims and why Shias and other non Sunni groups are not muslims. Why the Bengali muslim became a Kafir and killed, raped them in millions? I am sorry, you asked for explanation and I was forced to provide it. By the way, kindly visit the search engines on internet to enlighten yourself inclusively. Here is just one link:

    “Qur’an 77:38 and Qur’an 9:5 allows the Muslim to use any stratagem. A common Muslim defense is that this applies ‘only in war’ However as has been demonstrated, Muslims are always at war. Considering that non-believers can not be friends with Muslims. Therefore any relations can only be governed by enmity or truce. Also, Considering the Muslims are allowed to break a truce whenever they choose without prior warning (very dishonourable conduct) as per Treaties, I would have to argue that Muslims are constantly at war.”

    Don’t blame me. By the way, those three Kashmiri girls also want to know, “What was their fault to be ostracised by the Religion of Peace(piece).” Innocent teenage girls who wanted to sing…shamefully fatwaised…

    VA:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
    • You shouldn’t evaluate Islam based on how some follow it 1400 years later. Evaluate by its original teachings and how its early followers practiced those teachings.

      You wanted examples I gave you three examples of Muslims contributing very positively to society … did you care to comment on those examples?

      Muslims are only under an Islamic physical war under the following conditions:

      [Qur’an 22:40-41] “Permission to fight is given to those against whom war is made, because they have been wronged — and Allah indeed has power to help them —
      Those who have been driven out from their homes unjustly only because they said, ‘Our Lord is Allah’ — And if Allah did not repel some men by means of others, there would surely have been pulled down cloisters and churches and synagogues and mosques, wherein the name of Allah is oft commemorated. And Allah will surely help one who helps Him. Allah is indeed Powerful, Mighty —”

      Condition 1: Wronged
      Condition 2: Driven out from homes
      Condition 3: Because they said ‘Our Lord is Allah’

      All three don’t apply no more. Condition 3 specially don’t apply no more.

      VA:F [1.9.22_1171]
      Rating: -1 (from 1 vote)
      • Dear One, Respectfully I do not need advice to understand what to follow? I also agree on 1400 years of but aggression, loot, butchery, hate incessantly. I can produce verses from Quran that Muslims and non Muslims fear equally. I can understand that you are finding yourself hurt and cornered by the rampant uncivilised practices in Islamic world. A pinch of practice is better than precpts in volumes.

        Why should one call other a “non-believer”? It is insulting, humiliating and denigrating others. How would you feel if I call you same “non-believer”. I reject the Quran and Islam. Does it give the jihadis a right to kill me? Why such bigotry?

        You evaded conveniently my reference to brutalities in Kashmir and by exrension in India read against Hindus and Jews in Israel. Why? While a Mullah in Kashmir passed a fatwa against the teenage Muslim girls, whose only faul was, they wanted to sing. What was the fault of Malala Yusufzai? because she wanted to study? Hence it the silly practices of Islamic marauders that is a threat to this world. You are posing “apologias” on behalf of this indefencible ideology, which has been a curse to others in last 1400 years.

        Instead of trying to teach others, self education is better. In the current scenario, Islam remains under radar and either reform or perish, is the choice.

        BTW, you may be knowing this Islamist goon living now in exile in Lebanon, Omar Bakri Muhammad for his fanaticism after bomb blasts in London 7/7, he calls west depraved (of sex) and his own daughter – Yasmin Fostok, performing cabaret dance in London enjoying life. Muhammad was divorced by his wife, then he remarried a girl one year younger than Yasmin, shameful it looks?

        I must finish with some pious Quranic verses (ayat), here:
        There are two forms of lying to non-believers that are permitted under certain circumstances, taqiyya and kitman. These circumstances are typically those that advance the cause Islam – in some cases by gaining the trust of non-believers in order to draw out their vulnerability and defeat them.
        The Qur’an:
        Qur’an (16:106) – Establishes that there are circumstances that can “compel” a Muslim to tell a lie.

        Qur’an (3:28) – This verse tells Muslims not to take those outside the faith as friends, unless it is to “guard themselves.”

        Qur’an (9:3) – “…Allah and His Messenger are free from liability to the idolaters…” The dissolution of oaths with the pagans who remained at Mecca following its capture. They did nothing wrong, but were evicted anyway.

        Qur’an (40:28) – A man is introduced as a believer, but one who must “hide his faith” among those who are not believers.

        Qur’an (2:225) – “Allah will not call you to account for thoughtlessness in your oaths, but for the intention in your hearts” The context of this remark is marriage, which explains why Sharia allows spouses to lie to each other for the greater good.

        Qur’an (66:2) – “Allah has already ordained for you, (O men), the dissolution of your oaths”

        Qur’an (3:54) – “And they (the disbelievers) schemed, and Allah schemed (against them): and Allah is the best of schemers.” The Arabic word used here for scheme (or plot) is makara, which literally means deceit. If Allah is deceitful toward unbelievers, then there is little basis for denying that Muslims are allowed to do the same. (See also 8:30 and 10:21)

        Taken collectively these verses are interpreted to mean that there are circumstances when a Muslim may be “compelled” to deceive others for a greater purpose.

        Here is a link:

        So we have a religion in the garb of a “political idelogy” to lie (Taqiya and Kitman stratagem), Muslims find offended but fail misearably to address the concern of others who lived peacefully before 14000 years…Peace has been shattered into pieces. Wherever Muslims went, caused death and destruction and jealously used the exactly same sites of worships of others to erect their deadly “Mosque-Madarsa” kitman barracks. I am sorry but it is a frightening situation, how easily they get enraged. I hear their voices from here, what they speak in Islamabad, Hafiz must be annulled including his entire brigade of LeT, DifeP etc. All maddening…

        VA:F [1.9.22_1171]
        Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
        • Is it scholarly to criticize a religion based on how people follow it 1400 years after its origin? Is it fair to evaluate Islam on how some follow it 1400 years later? Should we look at RSS and evaluate Hinduism? This was my reply to your “brutalities in Kashmir” statement … it seems I was not clear enough and you thought I “evaded” your statements. In fact this is my reply to the first five paragraphs of your reply which state a plethora of attrocities and acts of condemnation conducted by Muslims which should be punished according to the dictates of justice.

          But to evaluate Islam based on these actions of Muslims 1400 years after the religion was revealed … is that fair?

          [Qur’an 5:9] “O ye who believe! be steadfast in the cause of Allah, bearing witness in equity; and let not a people’s enmity incite you to act otherwise than with justice. Be always just, that is nearer to righteousness. And fear Allah. Surely, Allah is aware of what you do.”

          [Qur’an 4:136] “O ye who believe! be strict in observing justice, and be witnesses for Allah, even though it be against yourselves or against parents and kindred. Whether he be rich or poor, …”

          Now let’s reply to the verses you quoted because, yes, you can use the original text of a religion to criticize the religion.

          [16:107] “Whoso disbelieves in Allah after he has believed — save him who is forced thereto while his heart finds peace in the faith — but such as open their breasts to disbelief, on them is Allah’s wrath; and they shall have a severe punishment.”

          Clearly, judgement on those who are forced is not stated in this verse. Nowhere does the verse condone this act. However, four verses later we find God saying the following about those who lied about their faith:

          [16:111] “Then, surely, thy Lord — to those who fled their homes after they had been persecuted and then struggled hard in the cause of Allah and remained steadfast — aye, surely, after that thy Lord is Most Forgiving, Merciful.”

          “Most Forgiving, Merciful” clearly indicates that the act of lying is a sin regardless … but a sin that may be forgiven (like so many other sins) granted the person flees his house and struggles hard. Nowhere is the sin of lying condoned. However, forgiveness for lying (like all sins) is possible eventually.

          Let’s continue discussion of other verses once you have agreed to the above.

          [Qur’an 16:91] “Verily, Allah enjoins justice, and the doing of good to others; and giving like kindred; and forbids indecency, and manifest evil, and wrongful transgression. He admonished you that you may take heed.”

          LeT, DifeP, etc. are all condenmable and punishable groups and every government should punish their extremists be they in India (RSS) or Pakistan.

          VA:F [1.9.22_1171]
          Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
          • Good that at last you have some reply to save your skin. I did not think scholarly like you, why my brother? I think i should have also known that RSS is the organisation perpetuating all these training camps in pakistan occupied kashmir and sending all these jihadis (sanskrit word) all over the globe, e.g. (in)famous 9/11, 26/11, German bakery blast, 7/7 London blast, New York bomber, Boston bomber, Rigby killers, Hafiz Saeed is a RSS worker and Lashkar-e Taiba is also another name of RSS aka some Daw-ul Islam etc. Have a nice sleep now, you must have been overworking for last few days. All these atrocious jobs are insider stories to blame the pious Religion of Peace(piece). Just a curiosity, why does a Prophet need a peace be upon him from a mortal? I thought we worship a prophet or an apostle because S/He is all powerful and would afford peace to us. I
            do always use this pbuh but confused, is he scared of RSS?

            VA:F [1.9.22_1171]
            Rating: +1 (from 1 vote)
            • Your comments seem to be dragging towards insulting. I can only advise you to remain civilized and pray for you.

              [Qur’an 3:187] “… you shall surely hear many hurtful things from those who were given the Book before you and from those who set up equals to God. But if you show fortitude and act righteously, that indeed is a matter of strong determination.”

              So as per Islam’s instructions and the practice of our Holy Prophet (peace and blessings of Allah be upon him) who was first servant of God and a human being and a Prophet of Allah.

              I do not condone any of the examples you quoted … rather I condemn them. However, it does not sideline the fact that all religions have their extremists and pointing fingers isn’t the solution … solution is to condemn and punish these factions.

              [Qur’an 2:257] “There should be no compulsion in religion. Surely, right has become distinct from wrong; … ”

              [Qur’an 18:30] “And say, ‘It is the truth from your Lord; wherefore let him who will, believe, and let him who will, disbelieve.”

              [Qur’an 6:108] “And if Allah had enforced His will, they would not have set up gods with Him. And We have not made thee a keeper over them nor art thou over them a guardian.”

              VA:F [1.9.22_1171]
              Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
              • “Your comments seem to be dragging towards insulting. I can only advise you to remain civilized and pray for you.”

                I would like to join you in praying for these jihadis too. Anyway thanks for your enlightening apostolic discourse. This is your personal confusion that I am insulting you or anybody. Truth is bitter and appears insulting.

                I wish all these Islamic jihadis could heed your advice too to be civilised and let us both pray for them here and from now on, if it could help.

                Let me suggest that tagging RSS with these Islamic jihadis was unnecessary. Thanks for your prayers for me and I reciprocate it for you as well as everybody. Learn to confess the realities and see the other side with equal mindedness.

                VA:F [1.9.22_1171]
                Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
          • “Is it scholarly to criticize a religion based on how people follow it 1400 years after its origin?”

            Certainly is scholarly to use the 1,400 years to make concrete determinations as to what Islam is really about and its endless jihad.

            Early on 637 AD, Muslims solidified their conquest of Judea, and began immediately to persecute Christians and Jews who lived there.

            By the middle of the 9th century (about 200 years from its founding) Islam had attacked and conquered Egypt and all of northern Africa, Spain, Portugal, much of France; Greece, Iraq, Iran, Turkey, Afghanistan, Azerbaijan, Uzbekistan, Saudi Arabia, Kuwait, Qatar, the United Arab Emirates, southern Italy, and the Sindh in what is now Pakistan solely for purposes of domination.

            One jihad continued with many more conflicts, and continues to today.

            It is safe to use 1,400 of history to conclude Islam is a barbaric death cult… YES!!!!


            VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
            Rating: +1 (from 3 votes)
            • That is false. It is only fair to use the early followers to evaluate a religion. And those early followers held true to practices of patience and justice that no one can match.

              In fact, Islam did not do away with the effectiveness of corporal punishment when it came to saving mosques, churches, and synagogues as is highlighted below:

              [Qur’an 22:40-41] “Permission to fight is given to those against whom war is made, because they have been wronged — and Allah indeed has power to help them —
              Those who have been driven out from their homes unjustly only because they said, ‘Our Lord is Allah’ — And if Allah did not repel some men by means of others, there would surely have been pulled down cloisters and churches and synagogues and mosques, wherein the name of Allah is oft commemorated. And Allah will surely help one who helps Him. Allah is indeed Powerful, Mighty —”

              Condition 1: Wronged
              Condition 2: Driven out from homes
              Condition 3: Because they said ‘Our Lord is Allah’

              These conditions no longer apply today since no government fights another for believing in God. That is where Muslims are wrong and thereby they should cease all corporal “Jihads” immediately.

              VA:F [1.9.22_1171]
              Rating: -3 (from 3 votes)
  3. Mr Shamim, Truly speaking, I am bored of your rants and false apologies; However you seem to be either in complete dark about your ancestors, or reading a wrong history in Madaesa orchestrated Islamist history, or suffering from an inferior psychosis complex. If I won’t have replied you, it would have been injustice to you as well as your ancestors in Saudi Arabia aka Cannan. I won’t say a word but let you read this post here that speaks volumes about your ancestors: Follow the link:

    Just read the comment section.

    VA:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: +1 (from 1 vote)

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Optionally add an image (JPEG only)


This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.