Women Don’t Need Planned Parenthood to Get Affordable Care

The Planned
Parenthood Federation of America is a very curious health care provider. Begun long
ago as a birth control organization when contraceptives were contraband, the
organization evolved rapidly to adapt to the themes that preoccupied its famed

First, of
course, was Margaret Sanger, who combined her commitment to birth control with
an embrace of negative eugenics and rampant writing about “human weeds” and
segregation of the “unfit.”

Later, the
organization attracted a bipartisan array of private funding sources, and then
public sources, by adopting national security and population control themes.

This vision
of Planned Parenthood’s work has faded over time, even if population control
remains among its prime objectives and major donors include elites such as Warren
Buffett and Bill and Melinda Gates.

Today, the Planned Parenthood Federation of America is one of the wealthiest nonprofit networks in the nation. Its annual revenue was $1.66 billion in the last reporting year. It has total net assets of $1.88 billion, and excess revenue over expenses last year alone was $244.8 million–nearly a quarter of a billion dollars.

With the recent controversy and litigation over the Trump administration’s “Protect Life Rule” ending grants to groups that perform abortions in their family planning programs, one thing should be immediately clear. Planned Parenthood has more than enough excess annual revenue on hand–four times as much as needed–to replace the $60 million in grants it is forfeiting because of its decision to forgo federal Title X money because of the administration’s action.

In Case You Missed It:  One Year After Nord Stream Sabotage, Seymour Hersh Details How CIA Was Misled by Biden, Sullivan and Nuland

A second thing requires some research, but the historical data shows that, even with rising taxpayer funding over the past decade, Planned Parenthood’s client base for contraception has been shrinking. In fact, that base has declined by 20 percent–nearly 460,000 unique clients–since 2009. The organization is defying gravity and doing less with more.

But not in
every area of endeavor. With respect to abortion, Planned Parenthood’s
aggressive program, deplored even by some of its rivals in the industry, is

In the last reporting year, Planned Parenthood carried out 332,757 abortions, more than a third of the U.S. total. In Minnesota in 2018, Planned Parenthood performed a whopping 63.5% of all abortions in the state.

Planned Parenthood cleverly downplays its role in abortion by counting all individual services it performs and citing abortion as a low percentage overall. But in terms of revenue and core advocacy, providing abortions is central.

The group’s
aim is to make abortion normative–a routine procedure. Put another way, the aim
is to make abortion just another method of family planning.

that this is exactly what Title X of the Public Health Service Act, enacted in
1970 prior to Roe v. Wade, has
prohibited from the very beginning.

Section 1008
of the law categorically states: “None
of the funds appropriated under this subchapter shall be used in programs
where abortion is a method of family planning.”

Planned Parenthood is just such a program, as Dr. Leana Wen learned recently when Planned Parenthood fired her as its new president for suggesting that the mission focus should be on health care and not politics.

In Case You Missed It:  “Breach in Trust”: White House Dog Attacks Related to Joe Biden’s “Combustible” Relationship with Secret Service Agents: Report

But keeping Title X-subsidized clinics open using its own revenue is not what a political organization does. Nor is, of all things, complying with the Protect Life Rule by separating out abortion in the statistics and doing only neutral, nondirective counseling (under which the counselor makes no attempt to direct or promote a course of action).

In the wake of this defunding, attempted first by President Ronald Reagan and upheld by the Supreme Court but never implemented, some ask the question, “Where will the women affected go?”

It is impossible to prove there will not
be some disruptions in provision of contraceptives if Planned Parenthood holds
fast to its announced intention to turn women away, but consider the 21st-century
truth about contraception and federal programs.

The government’s Title X program has not
been cut by a single penny.  Other
programs and projects will begin to take up those funds and clients.  More women have Medicaid coverage today, and
no-cost contraceptive coverage mandates have affected most U.S. health

One Planned Parenthood CEO in the Midwest
remarked to Reuters after the passage of Obamacare in 2010 that the
organization expected 15% fewer clients because women now could “go anywhere”
for services.

Community health centers also are growing rapidly, with bipartisan support.  Tese changes likely explain the already well-advanced decline in Planned Parenthood clients.

The push is now on for over-the-counter
distribution of oral contraception, still the most popular method of birth

Virtually every pharmacy in America, now
dominated by large chain stores, has an entire section devoted to methods of
barrier and post-coital birth control. Most doctors prescribe contraception. And
nearly a dozen states now allow pharmacy distribution of orals without a

In Case You Missed It:  Despite providing limitless military aid and “unconditional support” to Israel, U.S. admits it has NO PLAN for what comes next

Even natural methods, which commonly
require no medical supervision, are on the rebound, with sophisticated apps
available to increase ease of use and reliability.

Last month, Planned Parenthood again chose its devotion to abortion on request over the needs of the women it claims to serve. Americans should be glad the nation is choosing a better path.

Source material can be found at this site.

Posted in Freedoms and tagged , , , , , , .