The Dark Side of Miss America and Bollywood


When Nina Davuluri of New York won Miss America 2013, she said in her first press conference after the victory:


I’m so happy this organization has embraced diversity. I’m thankful there are children watching at home who can finally relate to a new Miss America.


However this crowning of the first Miss America of Asian Indian descent  brought out attitudes which one would have thought long dead and buried. The country had only recently celebrated the half century anniversary of the watershed ‘I Have a Dream Speech’ by Dr Martin Luther King. In 1963 Dr King led 250,000 protesters in the March on Washington and delivered his famous speech from the steps of the Lincoln Memorial:

I have a dream that my four little children will one day live in a nation where they will not be judged by the colour of their skin but by the content of their character


A Colour Blind America?

In the fiftieth anniversary celebrations in August this year, celebrities such as  Oprah Winfrey and Jamie Foxx were among a list of speakers who addressed a nation that has made great strides in racial equality since King’s “dream” speech helped bring about landmark civil rights legislation. President Obama himself said:

His words belong to the ages, possessing a power and prophecy unmatched in our time. We rightly and best remember Dr. King’s soaring oratory that day, how he gave mighty voice to the quiet hopes of millions.

He was joined by former presidents Clinton and Carter. Former President George W. Bush, however was not in attendance, but echoed King’s historic words in a statement release:

Dr. King was on this Earth just 39 years, but the ideals that guided his life of conscience and purpose are eternal.  Honoring him requires the commitment of every one of us.  There’s still a need for every American to help hasten the day when Dr. King’s vision is made real in every community — when what truly matters is not the color of a person’s skin, but the content of their character.

Proclaiming a holiday in honor of Martin Luther King, Jr., President George W. Bush receives a portrait of the civil rights leader from his wife and children in the East Room Jan. 21, 2002. Photographed from left to right are Coretta Scott King, the President, Rev. Bernice King and Martin Luther King III.

Proclaiming a holiday in honor of Martin Luther King, Jr., President George W. Bush receives a portrait of the civil rights leader from his wife and children in the East Room Jan. 21, 2002. Photographed from left to right are Coretta Scott King, the President, Rev. Bernice King and Martin Luther King III.

But are Americans still being judged on their skin pigmentation rather than the content of their character? Just weeks after this fanfare Nina Davuluri faced a deluge of abuse from those voices in America which are the diametric opposite of what the civil rights struggle set to achieve. “And the Arab wins Miss America. Classic,” someone tweeted, obviously ignoring the rather inconvenient fact that Davuluri is actually of Indian origin and her parents were highly qualified professionals born in the Indian state of Andhra Pradesh. Davuluri comes from a family of doctors. Her parents Koteswara Chowdary and mother Sheila Ranjani are doctors in the US, as are her paternal uncles. She has an elder sister, Meena, who is in her third year of medicine. She herself also speaks Telegu as well as English, and not Arabic. Indeed someone of Arab origin had already won the contest in 2010, Rima Fakih. So the bigoted and ignorant cannot even get their racial slurs correct. Other tweets referred to Davuluri as Miss al-Qaeda, Miss terrorist and her victory being a slap in the faces of those victims of 9/11.

But Miss America’s family are in fact India and not even Muslim. She would get a rather cold reception in America’s long-term allies Saudi Arabia and Kuwait. Indeed her ancestral homeland was suffering attacks from the very terrorist groups that these supposedly ‘patriotic’ Americans detest. Indeed if anything they give fodder to the hardcore Islamist cause by equating Islam with race. Could CAIR and a host of other organisations sympathetic to the Muslim Brotherhood and Hamas, and funded by Saudi Arabia and Qatar, wish for better volunteer foot soldiers? Any attack on Islam is deemed racist by such groups because Muslims are seen as an ‘ethnic’ minority and as such Islam is deemed above criticism. Hence the whole discourse surrounding 9/11, the failure of the Arab Spring and the war in Syria is dominated by dishonest politically correct smoke and mirrors.

Other tweets kept the racial abuse more direct. Upon her crowning, Twitter overflowed with angry, post-9/11 racial hatred. “Miss New York is an Indian. With all due respect, this is America” chimed one tweeter. Another angrily writes, “How the fuck does a foreigner win miss America? Miss America was castigated as Miss 7/11, a reference to Indian-Americans owning convenience stores. For a country that prides itself on self-help, hard Protestant work ethic and above all not being reliant on the state, this type of racial abuse went against its very ethos. The immigrant who pulls him or herself up the by the boot straps has long been an admired figure. But for the backward thinking hate element even this most quintessential of American values was a problem. Dalavuri herself brushed aside the racist tweets:

I have to rise above that. I always viewed myself as first and foremost American.

Nina Davuluri Miss America

Rational and mature debate is not an option with these bigots and racists, as much as it is with the Islamic forces presently clearing Syria of Christians, Druze and Alawites.

The Disunited States?


The fact is that there are two Americas running side by side and clashing. One is the vision set out by Martin Luther King and celebrated this year by President Obama and his predecessors: Bush, Clinton and Carter. This is the America where a person can succeed no matter what their background. Obama himself demonstrates this. In a country which was built on the import of African slaves and where blacks were forcibly separated from whites by statutory laws, now a person of African descent was not only elected but re-elected. This may be thought of as the new America but is it? Davuluri was mocked for performing her ‘Egyptian’ dance. It was actually Indian, but then rationality and common sense was hardly a character trait of social misfits with a racial superiority complex or those intent on jihad. Yet was it even exotic? Jazz, rock ‘n’ roll, hard rock, blues, soul and hip-hop are again quintessential American products and exports as much as blue jeans and cola drinks. They are deeply rooted in the largest minority group which were once slaves and then kept crushed under social and legal apartheid. African-American contribution to mainstream culture has been immense. Yet they were barred from what was once a beauty contest to celebrate racial purity. The first African Americans to ever appear in the Miss America Pageant came onstage as ‘slaves’ for a musical number in 1923. It was not until 1970 that a black woman, Iowa’s Cheryl Brown, won a state title and made it to Atlantic City as a contestant. Lencola Sullivan, Miss Arkansas 1980, was the first African American to make it to the top five. In 1984 Vanessa Williams finally broke the racial barrier to became the first black Miss America. This did not stop her from receiving death threats and hate mail on account of her race, eerie precedents to the barrage of abuse faced by Davuluri.

The African-American experience has also been mirrored in other communities that were victims of prejudice. Jewish-Americans in particular stand out in this regard. Jazz received major influence from the traditional Yiddish music of East European immigrants who lived often cheek-by-jowl with blacks in northern cities.


The solidly Democrat South was known for its harsh lynch law against any blacks who transgressed segregated parameters of race. Yet this prejudice could also land on others such as with the notorious lynching of Leo Frank in Georgia in 1917, following heated anti-Semitism in his trial and conviction.

Jews were also barred from Miss America contests. In fact the pageant’s long history of excluding women of colour dates from its very beginnings. At some point in the 1930s, it was formalized in the notorious rule number seven of the Miss America rule book. Instituted under the directorship of Lenora Slaughter, rule number seven stated that “contestants must be of good health and of the white race.” As late as 1940, all contestants were required to list, on their formal biological data sheet, how far back they could trace their ancestry. In the pageant’s continual crusade for respectability, ancestral connections to the Revolutionary War or perhaps the Mayflower would have been seen as a plus. Bess Myerson was the daughter of Russian-Jewish parents, and was pressured to change her name to a less Jewish-sounding name. In 1945 Myerson became the first Jewish Miss America. In 1941 a Native American, Mifauny Shunatona, represented Oklahoma at the pageant, though there would not be another Native American contestant for 30 years. Irma Nydia Vasquez from Puerto Rico, and Yun Tau Zane from Hawaii, the first Asian contestant, both broke the colour bar in 1948.

Nevertheless the undercurrent of hostility remains. Since Vanessa Williams in 1984, there have been other black Miss Americas, as well as the first Asian Miss America, Angela Baraquio, Miss Hawaii of 2000. Today, the Miss America Pageant has made diversity part of its official mission. But this diversity runs counter to an America which in many respects mirrors the racial prison gangs such as the Aryan Brotherhood which segregate inmates into white, black and Hispanic tribes. The massacre at the Sikh gurdwara in Wisconsin and attacks on Indian-Americans in response to ‘terrorism’, notably the murder of Balbir Singh Sodhi in ‘revenge’ for the 9/11 attacks demonstrate that this nasty flotsam element is never far from the surface.

The Blond Beast of Bollywood

Before the rise of the ‘Black is Beautiful’ concept at the end of the 1960s, hair straighteners and skin-lightening creams did mammoth trade among African-Americans. It will be surprising, and no doubt harsh, to realise that skin-lightening agents are also popular in India. In 2005, Susan Runkle, a Ph.D. candidate in Cultural Anthropology at Syracuse University, undertook over a year of intensive research into the nascent beauty industry in South Asia. This included her participant observation as an academic researcher and unpaid consultant at the Miss India pageant’s six week intensive training program for contestants. Runkle made disturbing findings:

I sat in on weekly individual sessions that dermatologist Dr. Jamuna Pai held with the contestants in order to examine their skin. Every single one of the young women was taking some sort of medication to alter her skin, particularly in colour, in the training programme in 2003. In a disturbingly casual manner, Dr. Pai emphasized the need for all the contestants to bleach their skin by prescribing the peeling agent Retin-A as well as glycolic acid and, in the case of isolated dark patches, a laser treatment.

When I asked Dr. Pai, who trained as a plastic surgeon in London, why fair skin was such a concern at the pageant, she offered the following explanation. “Fair skin is really an obsession with us, it’s a fixation. Even with the fairest of the fair, they feel they want to be fairer. It isn’t important anymore, because the international winners are getting darker and darker. You wouldn’t notice our obsession, because you have such beautiful white skin, but I feel it’s ingrained in us. When an Indian man looks for a bride, he wants one who is tall, fair and slim, and fairer people always get jobs first. Today, this is being disproved because of the success internationally of dark-skinned models, but we still lighten their skin here because it gives the girls extra confidence when they go abroad.”

In the name of confidence, then, the contestants undergo chemical peels and daily medication, some of which have rather unpleasant side effects. Harsimrat, for example, often complained to the doctor that she felt nauseous and weak as a result of the medication prescribed to lighten her South Indian skin.


Writing in the Huffington Post, Asha Rangappa, Associate Dean at Yale Law School, notes that in India Nina Davaluri would not even have had a chance to make it into the beauty contest.

Take, for example, Bollywood actress and former Miss World, Aishwarya Rai. Known as “the most beautiful woman in the world,” Rai is India’s crown jewel of female Indian beauty and the standard against which all other Indian women are compared — despite the fact that she has barely-olive skin, brown hair and green eyes, practically a mutation in the predominantly dark-complected subcontinent. Do a Google search of historical and recent Miss India winners and other top-billed Bollywood actresses, and you’ll see why Indians collectively spend more on skin-whitening products than they do on Coca Cola (about £293 million), including creams, face cleansers, shower gels and — I’m not kidding — vaginal washes. The industry is supported by the Bollywood stars themselves, who do ad campaigns for major companies like Fair & Lovely. A typical ad has a movie star tossing a tube of lightening cream to a dark-skinned fan, who miraculously transforms into a star also.


Marriage adverts constantly reference girls as being fair or ‘wheat’ coloured. In orphanages the dark-skinned children are the ones which are constantly rejected. In many respects America is actually far ahead of India in respects of looking at character and other features, rather than a blind obsession with skin colour. As Rangappa states:

It’s no wonder that in the U.S., “intermarriage” — marriage to non-Indians — occurs at a much higher rate among Indian women than Indian men. I guess it’s better to be considered “exotic” and desirable by members of other races than to be considered ugly by your own.

Bollywood has massive influence on the Indian masses, despite the proliferation of social media and other technologies even down to the remotest village. Yet it is this the world’s largest film industry which promotes that image of white skin as beauty, portraying people who not only do not live like the masses of their adoring fans, but look physically different. Bollywood has a selection process that if it were to add blond hair and blue eyes as necessary requirements, would to Himmler and ‘The Blond Beast’ Reinhard Heydrich of the SS proud. In fact it could be argued that these ‘Aryan’ features are becoming part of the criteria. While the Nazis looked upon Slavs as inferior scouts from the SS used to scour villages and town in Poland for suitable racial stock that could be moulded into the master race.

Today it is the turn of Bollywood scouts. Yana Gupta was famous for her item number in the 2002 film Dum. But she was actually born Jana Synková in what was then Czechoslovakia. There were always the occasional white actresses in Indian movies of the ’50s and ’60s that portrayed scantily-dressed temptresses with a cigarette in their hand and consuming alcohol. Indian cinema has long had an unhealthy racial fascination, with the gori chori. The fair ones thrust their chest and “jiggy-wiggy” with the hero in raunchy Bollywood songs wearing next to nothing. Most foreign white women who work in the Indian movie industry are relegated to the portrayal of arm candy, dancers dressed in sparse, garish clothes, either the vamp or the candidate for a one-night-stand when the actor is jilted, drunk or upset.

On 11 May 2013, Vibha Kumar reported on this issue in the Sunday Guardian. On set, everyone from the spot boy to the director makes them feel like pieces of meat. Katja Vovk and Anca Cobzaru from Donbas, Ukraine and Muntenia, Romania respectively, told Kumar:

We came from eastern Europe and earn decent money. It is a struggle always, we try to live with dignity but it is hard in Bollywood.

In July 2009 RT News reported that Zeb Chaudhary, Director of Dansync Entertainment, brings in foreign dancers for six months at a time to work in Bollywood. The girls come on work permits and he arranges their accommodation, transport and food:

We have our managers in different countries; we work with Russia, with Ukraine, with Belarus. We have a girl from Australia and a Spanish girl. These managers keep finding me beautiful girls and groups. Once they have a group, they get in touch with me.

Competition is intense just as the exploitation is rife.

Hinduism Celebrated Dark Skin

Rangappa makes the flawed argument that obsession with light-skin dates back to the Aryan invasion of India. Of course no such invasion ever happened and was itself the brainchild of racist colonialist thinking that tried to deny Indians their own history. Well if that was not the case how did the hatred for darker skin come about? Certainly colonial rule had its impact. This can be seen not just in India but most obviously in South Africa, West Indies and the Americas where whites ruled over darker races: either indigenous or those imported as slaves from Africa. Yet can this be the only reason? The overthrow of Gaddafi in Libya led to wave of racial attacks and killings against anyone with darker skin. In Mauritania even those blacks freed from the slavery which continues illegally and underground, are not considered full citizens by the ruling White Moors, but inferior subhuman Africans who belong across the river in Senegal. In Pakistan the Makranis of obvious African descent suffer discrimination and poverty. In Yemen the Akhdam community live in horrific poverty, despised as untouchables because of their darker skin.

In India we first hear of antipathy towards darker skin from the Medieval period following the invasions of Turks, Afghans, Iranians and Arabs. Well this about as politically correct as it can get, because these particular incursions were due to Islam. For example,  Jean-Baptiste Tavernier visited Mughal India during the reign of Shah Jahan in the seventeenth century. He made this observation on the ruling class:

 They were called Moguls, that is, white of complexion . . . the natives being all brown or olive colour.

The physician François Bernier also noted the skin colour of the ruling elite:

…to be considered a Mogol, it is enough is a foreigner have a white face and profess Mahometanism.

The Iranians who dominated the Mughal regime oppressing India’s toiling dark-skinned masses. The Iranian colonisers even looked down upon the Mughals (who were Chagatai Turks) and Indians as barbarians and were helped in their superior status by a preference for lighter skin colour. Indeed Bernier said that as successive generations of Iranian immigrants became darker, they lost the respect accorded to newcomers and all fair-skinned Muslim immigrants as part of the ruling class. Italian traveller Niccolao Manucci said that Iranians constantly referred to Indians as “slaves” or “blacks”. Afghans, though part of the ruling class, were portrayed as crude and vulgar. Slaves imported from Africa were treated the worst by the ruling races. Their descendants live near Mumbai and are still called ‘Habshi’ indicating their African origin. The Arabs had long looked down upon the Africans as inferior ‘Zanj’. We hear of Nat Turner and the slave revolt in Saint Dominigue by Toussaint L’Ouverture which led to the establishment of Haiti. Yet how many are aware that the first attempts at plantation slavery was by the Abbasid caliphate? Or even that this led to slave revolts by the Zanj in the eighth and ninth centuries? As I have mentioned in a previous article, the Zanj rebellion resulted in extremely racist attitudes towards blacks, as expressed in Arabic literature, by poets of Ethiopian descent, known as the “black crows of the Arabs”, such as Suhaym (d. 660), Nusayb ibn Rabah (d. 726), and Abu Dulama (d. c.776), pointing to clear evidence that black slaves had the lowest position in Muslim society. Racism was in fact as central to Arab slavery as it was in the western system which developed later. Arabs saw their own olive pigmentation as preferable to lighter Greeks and Iranians as well as darker people of the Horn of Africa. Early Arabic poetry describes the many nuances of human coloration. In fact the name of the seventh century poet, Suhaym, literally means “little black man”, and he penned verses such as the following:

Though I am a slave my soul is nobly free

Though I am black of colour my character is white

Nusayb ibn Rabah responded to a racist attack on him with this:


Blackness does not diminish me, as long as I

Have this tongue and this stout heart.

Some are raised by means of their lineage; the

Verses of my poems are my lineage!

How much better a keen-minded, clear-spoken

Black than a mute white!

By the fourteenth century, the Arabic word “abd” as used to mean black slave, while “mamluk” meant a white slave. Black Africa remained a major source of slaves for the Islamic world until well into the twentieth century. Blacks came to be seen as natural slaves when compared to other races. It was this prejudice against darker skin which was imported into India and has been entrenched their over the centuries. It far predated the racist attitudes enforced by colonialism and yet it remains politically incorrect to discuss this because it is tantamount to ‘racially profiling’ Islam.


By contrast Hinduism has in fact celebrated dark skin. The Vedas speak of a spiritual struggle, a cosmic war, not some primeval racial conflict. The struggle between the forces of light and darkness is an allegory found in many other cultures such as Egyptian and Iranian. Why are these never accorded with racial epithets? In Hinduism Kali is the black goddess and her consort Shiva is also portrayed as dark-skinned. While these represent qualities and not actual racial categories, it would be rather absurd to have powerful deities with darker skin if such pigmentation was viewed as negative.


The whole discourse on skin colour preference in India has become a dishonest Stalinist propaganda exercise in linking it with caste and therefore continuing the outdated, flawed and ultimately racist theory about an Aryan invasion which never even happened.In fact there is actual evidence that darks-skin was considered beautiful in ancient India. This comes from a book by the man responsible for writing the constitution of independent India.


In ‘The Untouchables’ from 1948 (published by Bheem Patrika in Jalandhar) Dr BR Ambedkar gives us some starting revelations. Banbhatta was the court poet of King Harshavardhana in the seventh century. His Kadambari in Sanskrit is one of the earliest novels ever written. On pages 208 t 210, Ambedkar quotes from this work, describing a girl from the Chandala community who has come to give King Shudraka the gift of a parrot:

She herself seemed by the darkness of her hue to imitate Krishna when he guilefully assumed a woman’s attire to take away the amrita seized by the demons. She was, as it were, a doll of sapphire walking alone; and over the blue garment, which reached to her ankle, there fell a veil of red silk, like evening sunshine falling on blue lotuses. The circle of her cheek was whitened by the ear-ring that hung from one ear, like the face of nigh inlaid with the rays of the rising moon; she had a tawny tilaka of goracana, as if it were a third eye, like Parvati in mountaineer’s attire, after the fashion of the garb of Civa. She was like Ciri, darkened by the sapphire glory of Narayana reflected on the robe on her breast; or like Rati, stained by smoke which rose as Madana was burnt by the fire of wrathful Civa; or like Yamuna, fleeing in fear of being drawn along by the ploughshare of wild Balarama; or, from the rich lac that turned he lotus feet into budding shoots, like Durga, with her feet crimsoned by the blood of the Asura Mahisha she had just trampled on.

Her nails were rosy from the pink glow of her fingers; the mosaic to encircle her as with the arms of Agni, as though, by his love for her beauty, he would purify the stain of her birth, and so set the Creator at naught.

Her girdle was like the stars wreathed on the brow of the elephant of Love; and her necklace was a rope of large bright pearls, like the stream of Ganga just tinged by Yamuna.

Like autumn, she opened her lotus eyes; like the rainy season, she had cloudy tresses; like the circle of the Malaya Hills, she was wreathed with sandal; like the zodiac, she was decked with starry gems; like Cri, she had the fairness of a lotus in her hands; like a swoon, she entranced the heart; like a forest she was endowed with living beauty; like the child of a goddess she was claimed by no tribe; like sleep, she charmed the eyes; as a lotus-pool in a wood is troubled by elephants, so was she dimmed by her Matanga birth; like spirit, she might not be touched; like the latter, she gladdened the eyes alone; like the blossoms of spring she lacked the jati flower; her slender waist, like the line of Love’s bow, could be spanned by the hands: with her curly hair, she was like the Lakshmi of the Yaksha king in Alaka. She had but reached the flower of her youth, and was beautiful exceedingly.

It is time to ditch the Bollywood dystopian ‘Aryan’ type which bares no resemblance to reality in favour of the diversity which India has always embraced.






VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
Rating: 9.7/10 (3 votes cast)
The Dark Side of Miss America and Bollywood, 9.7 out of 10 based on 3 ratings
Posted in Freedoms, Terrorism and tagged , , , , , , , , , .


  1. Great article and yes to be truly ‘color blind’, someday we have to get past the hyphenated names like: Indian-American, African-American or German-American. We are all just Americans and that’s all that should matter!

    Even the word “diversity” suggests we are different, and we are not. All humans have the same wants and needs, we are all created by the same God, we are one!

    E pluribus unum!

    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: +3 (from 3 votes)
    • Yes I agree. It is just that sometimes we need terms like ‘diversity’ and ‘variety’ to remind us. It was heatening to see former president George W Bush echo Dr King’s words with their contemporary relevance.

      While America is moving forward in this regard, India is regrettably going in the other direction, helped by the poisonous influence of Bollywood. But it is now a globalised world and in this free market of ideas there is no media monopoly.

      VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
      Rating: +2 (from 2 votes)
      • Look at what Hollywood has done to Western civilization, it slowly eroded the minds of the watchers.

        The once Christian west is now full of sinner, atheist, adulterous and homosexuals. Bollywood sadly will erode India the same Hollywood has to the western civilization.

        VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
        Rating: +2 (from 2 votes)
        • The reaction is coming in a very interesting manner though. Porn media is losing money and even going bankrupt due to free online content. So the very people that smugly pushed degeneracy as freedom of expression are now being devoured by the very frankenstein they created. Hollywood, Bollywood etc will face demise as independent entrpreneurs give vent to true art and creativity, not mind destroying voyeurism.

          VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
          Rating: +2 (from 2 votes)
  2. Its a great article. With passage of time changes are coming. Some where it takes centuries to change the mind set. For example in Germany you dare not think on the lines one can think in USA. Another propping up aspect is spread of religion Islam. With passage of time when majority of American will embrace Ahmadiyya Islam such disparities will disappear automatically.

    VA:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: +1 (from 1 vote)
    • Zubair many thanks fro your feedback. But I don’t see how the majority of America will ever embrace Ahmadiyya – although of course you have every right to your own beliefs free from harassment, unlike what happens right now in Pakistan

      VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
      Rating: +1 (from 1 vote)
      • It is the prophecy by the messenger of God that Almighty will cause thy message to reach the corners of the world and before completion of 300 years to this claim (which was made 1889) the majority will accept Ahmadiyya. Many do laugh at this claim but this is what always happens with true messengers. The way Ahmadiyya has progressed in last 124 years at least I have no doubt in its wide spread.

        VA:F [1.9.22_1171]
        Rating: -1 (from 1 vote)
        • Well with the way Ahmaddiya getting treated in Pakistan, Indonesia and other places I would hardly call that progress. Prophecies are dime a dozen. Remember Mayan prophecy about 2012 end of the world. well guess what? it never happened!

          As for prophet of God, well Muhammad never existed and was a later invention to justify Arab conquests.

          VA:F [1.9.22_1171]
          Rating: +1 (from 1 vote)
          • If Muhammad (saw) never existed than probably no divine entitiy existed. Your argument stands good for non existence of each prophet.

            VA:F [1.9.22_1171]
            Rating: -1 (from 1 vote)
            • Well Zubair if that’s the conclusions you want to draw then fine. Read Robert Spencer and you might get a different opinion. If not then ponder this. Ahmadiyyas prosper in non-Muslim countries. Islamic states, even supposedly secular ones, regard the Qadiani school of Islam as heresy. If America went to any version of Islam it would be curtains for anyone outside that narrow sect. Ahmadiyyas may appear moderate yet they were instrumental in helping found Pakistan. Sir Zafrullah Khan is a prime example.

              VA:F [1.9.22_1171]
              Rating: +1 (from 1 vote)
              • Prophet of Islam was not accepted in Mecca. Moses was rejected by his own people. Jesus Christ was even crucified by his nation. Father Abraham was thrown in fire by his people. So Ahmadiyya not accepted by its own nation is not new in religious history. Every thing will be ok with passage of time.

                VA:F [1.9.22_1171]
                Rating: -1 (from 1 vote)
                • Ibn Ishaq wrote the biography of Muhammad a century after his supposed death. Contemporary accounts speak of Saracens but no Muslims or Islam. Early mosques face Jerusalem not Mecca. Quran is not even in Arabic. The belief that Jesus was not crucified is central to Islam yet you reject even this in order to prove your argument!

                  VA:F [1.9.22_1171]
                  Rating: +1 (from 1 vote)
        • Zubair Khan it interesting to compare Christian Biblical prophecy to Islamic prophecy. Have you ever watched former Muslim fundamentalist Walid Shoebat on the subject?

          Although Muslims should be aware in our Biblical Prophecy the rising Influential religion will be a false ideology with a false prophet. So to rise to power according to Christianity is not a good thing, once Islam or whatever surpasses the numbers of Christians after 2,000 plus years, that is the end days.

          They will hate the reformed Israel and wish it to be no more (Psalm 83) and they kill us for believing in God thinking they are serving God by killing others (John 16:2), in (Revelations 20:4) beheading was also mentioned. They will receive the their gospel from an angel like Islam did (Galatians 1:8).

          They will even bow toward a stone…(Leviticus 26:1-46)

          VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
          Rating: +2 (from 2 votes)
    • Zubair Khan it interesting to compare Christian Biblical prophecy to Islamic prophecy. Have you ever watched former Muslim fundamentalist Walid Shoebat on the subject?

      Although Muslims should be aware in our Biblical Prophecy the rising Influential religion will be a false ideology with a false prophet. So to rise to power according to Christianity is not a good thing, once Islam or whatever surpasses the numbers of Christians after 2,000 plus years, that is the end days.

      They will hate the reformed Israel and wish it to be no more (Psalm 83) and they kill us for believing in God thinking they are serving God by killing others (John 16:2), in (Revelations 20:4) beheading was also mentioned. They will receive the their gospel from an angel like Islam did (Galatians 1:8).

      They will even bow toward a stone…(Leviticus 26:1-46).

      Will there really be peace if the world was all “Islamic” seems they kill each other even more than the Kaffars? NO?

      VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
      Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
      • Just wait and the truth of Islam will revive through Ahmadiyya Islam. This is what God has promised and He is Almighty to fulfill what He promises.

        VA:F [1.9.22_1171]
        Rating: -1 (from 1 vote)
        • Zubair Ahmadiyya is being crushed throughout the Islamic world. It is only free nations such as USA, UK and for that matter India that give Qadianis the freedom to believe and preach. Yet you are so ungrateful that you want to force a bankrupt belief system (which deems your beliefs as heretical and issues fatwas demand death penalty for apostacy) on those very democratic countries!

          VA:F [1.9.22_1171]
          Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
        • In all due respect Zubair so far Islamist seem to have made cities worse off, not better off. All Muslims claim to be following the Qu’ran exactly as Mohammad taught, especially the fundamentalist.

          Appears the Qu’ranic message is not very clear to it followers if you have such a wide disproportion of understanding. One would think the divine Allah could have foreseen this?

          VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
          Rating: +1 (from 1 vote)
        • Pay Attention MUSLIMS!
          When God told Adam not to eat from the tree of good and evil God told Adam if you eat of it you well surely die.

          Adam ate of the forbidden fruit given to him by Eve, Both Adam and Eve disobeyed Gods command not to eat the fruit of that tree.

          The punishment that you shall surely die was not removed from Adam and Eve.

          God made a sacrifice of killing an animal to make clothes for them, and the animal sacrifice covered their sin and allowed God to continued to have a relationship with Adam and Eve but then could not stay in the Garden of Eden for if they ate of the tree of life sin against God would have no consequence and Gods sinless Kingdom would be destroyed.

          So God put them out of the garden with the punishment of dying for their disobedient to Gods command not to eat of the tree of good and evil.

          That punishment that they die for their sin of disobedient was passed on to us and that is called original sin,

          We all are born with that original sin that causes our body to die and decay to dust as from which we came from.

          The only one that is sinless and could die in our place and destroy the penalty of death is God Himself.

          So God prepared a body for Himself in the womb of the virgin Mary and became a human being just like us to die on the cross for our sins and destroy the sting of death caused by sin.
          Only God has the power to over come death and give life.

          In John 1:1-15 God explains how it was possible for God to do that for us.
          John 1:1-14
          New International Version (NIV)

          The Word Became Flesh
          1 In the beginning was the Word, and the Word was with God, and the Word was God. 2 He was with God in the beginning. 3 Through him all things were made; without him nothing was made that has been made. 4 In him was life, and that life was the light of all mankind. 5 The light shines in the darkness, and the darkness has not overcome[a] it.

          6 There was a man sent from God whose name was John. 7 He came as a witness to testify concerning that light, so that through him all might believe. 8 He himself was not the light; he came only as a witness to the light.

          9 The true light that gives light to everyone was coming into the world. 10 He was in the world, and though the world was made through him, the world did not recognize him. 11 He came to that which was his own, but his own did not receive him. 12 Yet to all who did receive him, to those who believed in his name, he gave the right to become children of God— 13 children born not of natural descent, nor of human decision or a husband’s will, but born of God.

          14 The Word became flesh and made his dwelling among us. We have seen his glory, the glory of the one and only Son, who came from the Father, full of grace and truth.

          God being born in the womb of Mary the Virgin preserved the nature of God in Jesus born without a human father.

          In the scriptures Jesus calls himself the Son of man for He took on human flesh derived from Adam the father of the human race.

          Thus Jesus became God-Man for our sake for in John 3:16 God explains why He did that.
          John 3:16
          New International Version (NIV)

          16 For God so loved the world that he gave his one and only Son, that whoever believes in him shall not perish but have eternal life.

          So Muslims it is God Himself that is paying for our forgiveness of our sins.

          That is why by the grace of God He is Forgiving.

          VA:F [1.9.22_1171]
          Rating: +2 (from 2 votes)
          • Dear All what ever you may say or quote this is not new in religious history. Jews even crucified Jesus but he and his religion not only provailed but prospered. Same is the fate of Ahmadiyya Islam. I have no conceren with the Islam these days majority is following. I advocate only true and real Islam being presented by Ahmadiyya. You all will see that it is only Ahmadiyya Islam which can guarantee the peace, love and harmony on globe. Ahmadiyya is a gift of Almighty which will pump new life to all the countries welcoming it and facilitating its progress.

            VA:F [1.9.22_1171]
            Rating: -1 (from 3 votes)
            • Zubair why do you keep quoting the crucifixion when Islam says Isa was never crucified? Even that has been traced to its Gnostic sources by Tom Holland and Robert Spencer. So what about this Ahmaddiya belief that he resided in Kashmir?

              Ahmaddiya is only peaceful because they are minority and hated by both Sunni and Shia (who even tolerate the Ismailis). They cannot even agree among themselves. Lahore Ahmaddiya for example is accepted by mainstream Islam, while majority do not

              VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
              Rating: +1 (from 1 vote)
              • Dear
                Ahmadiyya believes Jesus Christ was a great prophet of God. He was crucified but did not die on the cross. Later he was healed up of cross injuries and travelled towards Kashmir India in search of lost tribes of Israel. Over there he died natural death at the age of 120 years. His tomb is there in Khaniar Srinagar Kashmir. Recently Government of India has issued a 54 minute video which any one can view on the pages of themuslimtimes dot org. This is a very deeply researched video which supports the claim of founder of Ahmadiyyat. Since founder of Ahmadiyya, after getting divine guidance from God, has declared that old Jesus Christ is dead and no one has to come from heaven. He claimed to be the awaited Messiah, Krishna, Buddha and Imam Mahdi. In 1989 he made this claim. Until today no one else who is known to be prevailing has made such claim. If he is impostor why then any government or other power did not diminish this Ahmadiyya Community. Why this community is flourishing each day and now has sapling in 204 countries of the world. Lahore group which separated from main stream is no more know by any one. There is prophecy in many big religions that in later days will come a messenger of God (second advent of Jesus Christ) who will unite the humanity. This messenger has to be from Islam as it is the last revealed religion. According to this prophecy founder of Ahmadiyya has claimed to be that messenger of God who will revive the true Islam and with in 300 years of his claim (from 1889) majority of the world will accept him. There are people like you who laugh at this claim and consider him as impostor. This normal and no one is worried of such people. As per my belief God is Almighty and He has all the power. If He has made the founder of Ahamdiyya as His messenger He has to power which will force the mankind to accept this messenger of God.
                As for other Muslims are concerned they have gone far away from real teachings of Islam and have become stigma to the name of Islam. It is all due to their rejection of Imam Mahdi. How a religion can get good name when it rejects the Imam appointed by God. You will witness the main stream Muslim will never be able to resolve the Muslim problems and one day they will repent and revert back to the founder of Ahamdiyya and that will the day when Muslim world will become an exemplary place to reside.

                VA:F [1.9.22_1171]
                Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
                • Zubair again ask yourself, who do Ahmadiyyas prosper in non-Muslim countries. End of the day, Quran, Hadith and Sunnah cannot be changed. And using the principle of abrogation there is only so much elasticity that can be employed. I have seen Ahmadis in London selling Hadith volumes. Hardly reassuring is it?

                  Ahmaddiya arose in the same relgious ferment in Punjab in British India that prodcued Arya Smaj and Singh Sabha movements. It should be seen in that context.

                  You have every right to believe what you want, indeed preach and convert. But in a democratic society there will also be opposing viewpoints. That is pluralism. Hence that does not stop me from defending rights of Ahmadiyyas while disgreeing with their beliefs.

                  VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
                  Rating: +2 (from 2 votes)

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Optionally add an image (JPEG only)


This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.