With all the publicity in world-wide publications reporting on Islamic terrorism, the Obama Administration, and its leader, Barack H. Obama in particular, just can’t associate a connection between the two words, ‘Islam(ic)’ and ‘terrorism’. In their small world of personal intelligence and actual brains, Islam is known only as a “peaceful religion”.
In their diminutive world of opium or whatever brain destroyer they are currently absorbed in at any given moment, Islamic terrorism just doesn’t exist and all the mayhem, hijacking and destruction, including murder, is perpetrated by “thugs”, to which, they claim, Islam has no connection.
Never mind, eyewitness accounts from all forms of human world natives to the contrary, Obama has decreed that to mention the two words, Islam (ic) and terror(ism) is, in their minds, “Hate Speech” and punishable by legislation (of their selective choice.) It sometimes appears that “hate speech” is very, very selective depending on who uses it.
According to the un-American liberal Democrats, if coming from the conservatives of America, it is
Obama has in the past identified the Boko Haram segment of humanity, if you are inclined to grant them the designation of being human at all, as peaceful adherents of the Islamic religion. I said “in the past” because he, Obama, may have altered his position after their ‘not-anywhere-close-to-being-peaceful’ actions of recent times.
How about their anything-but-acceptable conduct this past April when they kidnapped 276 girls from a school in the town of Chibok? Dozens escaped, but 219 remain missing. They probably took those young school girls to justify their organizational identification of Boko Haram which has been translated in English to, ““Western education is forbidden”. They are quick to claim that admonishment, but never seem to apply it to their conduct, as in, “Islamic terrorism is forbidden.’‘
s if the heinous bit of behavior in connection with their seizure of young school girls was not bad enough, their totally outrageous behavior just in this month of January 2015 alone could qualify for the description of egregious, bloody and inhuman savagery of human life totally without compassion or care. The two acts when combined is almost equivalent to unspeakably brutal annihilation of civilization.
The destruction of life and property that Boko Haram inflicted of “what is likely to be Boko Haram’s deadliest attack ever” according to FoxNews.com online report of January 15, 2015, titled, “Group says satellite images show destruction of Nigeria villages by Boko Haram”. This report states that “Amnesty International has releasedsatellite images that it says show widespread destruction in two Nigerian towns attacked by Boko Haram last weekend.” (Jan. 10&11)
Obama and others are quick to criticize and condemn any reference to a connection between Islam religion and terrorists by the use of such a reference. Even the Foreign Minister Laurent Fabius who said the connective word should be “barbarity” was quoted by AP writer Elaine Ganley, (http://www.seacoastonline.com Europe Unrest) who named “iTele” as the source. Fabius also said, “he doesn’t want to link terrorists with those who practice their religion of peace.”
With so many people so quick to absolve other “peaceful persons of religion”, with whom should we the readers and watchers take homage? I realize there are some restrictions with the use of the word “profiling”, but is it unfair to call a person an Islamic terrorist who verbally claims success at seeking revenge when the alleged slight is aimed at Muhammad?
Or in order not to offend the followers of Islam, should those observers of the crimes just forget about seeking justice? I don’t know, you tell me.