Should We Re-enact Glass-Steagall?

(Examiner) The repealing of the Glass-Steagall Act was heralded as one of the greatest bipartisan achievements of our time. It was passed by an overwhelming majority by both Democrats and Republicans and signed into law by President William Jefferson Clinton on November 12, 1999.

  • Save

Signed into law by President William Jefferson Clinton on November 12, 1999

The minority who spoke out against the repeal were ridiculed and dismissed. Their words ring out as an ominous reminder of our foolishness. Greed can never be self regulated. Conflicts of interest are inherently vulnerable to loss of objectivity. A system without checks and balances is always doomed to fail in the end. If it is not tended and pruned systemically from the get go, it will grow wild and ultimately unproductive in the end.

Commercial and investment banking were able to cross the invisible divide and create an intricate network filled with conflicts of interest, newly created classes of securities, and institutions that became “too big to fail”. With their rapid growth the SEC and other regulators were unable to keep up with the changing landscape. Conflicts of interest began to form within the regulatory and rating agencies which further reduced the objectivity and accountability of the industry. It was only a matter of time before another downturn would hit and the bubble would burst causing one of the worst financial catastrophes we have seen in eighty years.

Senator John McCain and Senator Maria Cantwell in 2009 proposed legislation similar to the original Glass-Steagall Act that would reinstate the separation between commercial and investment banking. However, fierce opposition from banks who would be directly affected by the legislation effectively nixed any chance the bill had for passage.

The Dodd-Frank Act was an attempt to place additional protections for consumers, but not enough for adequate protection. It also failed to cut the size of institutions, which is the major factor in the crisis.

In Europe, stricter regulations are being called for in light of the global crisis and legislation is being constructed based on the original Glass-Steagall Act. This is significant because one of the original reasons for repeal is other countries’ ability to run their institutions without these restrictions.

The repeal of the Act was not the only factor in the crisis, but it was a major contributor. If we are to learn anything from this, it is that its removal has catastrophic consequences. There is always one troublemaker in the group and unfortunately it’s the banking industry, which is why we need to have regulations. Re-enacting the Glass-Steagall Act or something very similar should be one of our top priorities, or we will continue to see this scenario every few years. Once in a lifetime is more than enough.

In Case You Missed It:  Woke Advertising: Social engineering in TV commercials.
Posted in Financial and tagged , , .